Files
Nomarchy/agent/DELEGATION.md
Bernardo Magri c0fc16e25c
All checks were successful
Check / eval (push) Successful in 4m28s
docs(agent): vendor-neutral agent docs — AGENTS.md entry, agent/ SoT, .claude shims
The repo is maintained by agents from multiple vendors, so agent
instructions move out of vendor-specific locations into shared,
git-tracked markdown:

- AGENTS.md is the new entry point for any harness; CLAUDE.md becomes a
  symlink to it (Claude Code keeps working unchanged).
- Skill bodies relocate to agent/: VERIFICATION.md (the enforcement
  rules, ex .claude/skills/nomarchy), DELEGATION.md (capability tiers
  light/standard/frontier, scout/runner role contracts, token economy,
  parallel fan-out — consolidates the CLAUDE.md model table, LOOP.md's
  economy section, and skill §6.5 into one place; vendor model names
  survive only in the per-harness mapping table), THEME-DESIGN.md
  (ex .claude/skills/theme, which previously lacked frontmatter).
- .claude/ shrinks to a thin Claude Code adapter: settings, subagent
  defs, and skill shims that route into agent/.
- Maps updated: agent/README.md (instructions vs state vs adapters),
  docs/README.md, README.md layout tree.

Cleanup: stale old_distro .gitignore entry dropped (dir long gone);
local result*/__pycache__ artifacts removed; JOURNAL.md rotated (29
recent entries kept, 120 older moved to agent/JOURNAL-ARCHIVE.md,
rotation rule documented in the header).

Verification: V0 (docs/meta only) — nix flake check --no-build exit 0
with the tracked symlink; grep sweep confirms no vendor model names
outside DELEGATION.md's mapping table.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 08:58:25 +01:00

113 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown

# Delegation — capability tiers, roles, token economy
How to spend model capacity in this repo, for **any** agent harness.
Tasks are matched to capability *tiers*, not vendor model names; each
harness maps tiers to its own models (table at the bottom). GOALS says
what to build, CONVENTIONS how to write it — this says who does which
part.
## The dividing line: evidence vs judgment
Cheap models gather evidence; they never make verification claims or
design decisions. The following always stay on the **frontier** tier and
are never delegated downward:
- deciding what to test and the regression scope (VERIFICATION.md)
- interpreting an ambiguous or flaky failure
- viewing screenshots and judging visual quality — aesthetic judgment is
exactly what small models do badly, and it's load-bearing here
- writing non-trivial Nix (module structure, overlays, cross-cutting
refactors)
- the final diff review and report
Product calls ("finish vs quarantine", promoting PROPOSED items) sit
above even that: they belong to the human.
## Tiers
| Tier | Best for | Delegate to it? |
|------|----------|-----------------|
| **light** | bulk mechanical: search, summarize, audit sweeps, running the harness | freely — never for judgment |
| **standard** | well-specified scoped edits, routine research | when the spec is already written |
| **frontier** | design, novel code, ambiguous failures, taste | this is the loop's own tier |
Reasoning effort: default moderate; go maximum only for the hardest
calls. A frontier parent may spawn a frontier child for one hard call.
Work above your tier gets returned, not attempted.
## Standing roles
Two mechanical roles exist for any harness that supports subagents
(Claude Code implementations: `.claude/agents/`; other harnesses
implement the same contracts in their own format):
- **scout** (light, read-only): locate where things are defined, map
which files touch a subsystem, scan build logs / serial output for
error lines, docs-vs-code drift sweeps. Reports facts with paths and
line numbers, quotes the minimum snippet, says "not found" plainly —
never guesses, never recommends.
- **runner** (light, executes): builds, VM boots, screenshot capture,
the scripted `tools/` checks. Headless and unattended, every wait
bounded by a timeout. Returns commands, exit codes, wall time, and
artifact paths — never marks anything passed or verified; the caller
makes the verification claim.
Use them for pure information-gathering or pure execution instead of
pulling bulk (log files, wide scans) into the main context. When a
result surprises you, spot-check it yourself before building on it —
cheap models are allowed to be wrong about hard things, which is
precisely why they're not allowed to make claims.
## Economy rules
- **Only delegate when writing the spec is cheaper than doing the
work** — a spawned agent starts cold and must re-derive context. A
one-file read is cheaper done directly.
- **Brief every child cold; point at the spec, don't restate it.** "The
spec is in `agent/BACKLOG.md` #NN — implement it" plus only the
*constraints* (scope files, branch, no-VM, no-push).
- **Match the tier to the task, not the prestige.** An item whose spec
is already written (exact files, exact fixes) is standard-tier work;
reserve frontier children for genuine multi-step reasoning. This is
the single biggest saving.
- The strong model writes the spec, reviews the result, and owns the
commit.
## Fanning out parallel work (V0/V1, no VM)
When several NEXT items are independent and don't need the VM, spread
them across worktree-isolated subagents in parallel:
- **Disjoint file lanes.** Partition items so no two agents touch the
same file (map the touched files first). If two items must share a
file (README, flake.nix, rofi.nix), give both to one agent or keep
one for yourself.
- **Isolation + you own landing.** Each agent works in an isolated
worktree, commits to its own branch, and **never pushes or touches
`main`/`v1`**. You review each diff, cherry-pick onto `main`, and do
the bookkeeping — a single landing agent can't race itself. Clean up
worktrees and branches after landing.
- **Lean on scriptable checks as primary evidence.** Where a
deterministic `tools/` check or `checks.*` guard already proves the
property, that near-free run *is* the V0/V1 evidence.
- **Batch V2 at the end, once.** Delegated visual/behavioural items come
back "V2 pending"; collect the landed changes and do **one** VM pass
covering all of them — the VM render + screenshot review is the most
expensive step in the loop; amortise it.
- **Re-verify on `main`, but leanly.** After landing, confirm the
agent's V0/V1 on the merged tree with a targeted build, not a full
re-run. Trust-but-spot-check scales; blind re-running doesn't.
The judgment list above still holds: *you* review every diff before it
lands.
## Per-harness model mapping
| Tier | Claude Code |
|------|-------------|
| light | `haiku` |
| standard | `sonnet` |
| frontier | the session's top model (`opus` and up) |
Other harnesses: add a column when one is actually used on this repo.