Files
Nomarchy/docs
Bernardo Magri b4fe4985bf
All checks were successful
Check / eval (push) Successful in 3m54s
fix(theme): destructive buttons were invisible after #98 (1.03:1)
e9dd3d1 pinned dialog button labels to base00 for dark palettes. That is
correct for suggested-action, whose background adw-gtk3 builds opaquely as
mix(white,@accent_bg_color,0.9) — but destructive-action is the one class
whose background is derived from currentColor:

  background-color: mix(@destructive_color, alpha(currentColor, 0.15), 0.9)

so pinning the label dragged the background down with it. On Boreal the
"Delete" button of a GtkMessageDialog rendered #21272F on #252931 —
1.03:1, invisible — and light palettes hit the same 1.03:1. The most
safety-critical button in a confirmation dialog was the one that vanished.

Pin the destructive background to the same opaque pastel ladder
suggested-action uses. Enabled-only (:not(.flat):not(:disabled)): the
sheet's disabled chrome already renders legibly and must keep it.

Boreal 1.03 -> 6.19:1, summer-day 1.03 -> 2.74:1 (= upstream's
white-on-accent convention; the residual light-mode weakness is #130).

V2: GtkMessageDialog rendered under the real HM session and viewed —
boreal before/after, summer-night (whole-swap), summer-day (light).
Scripted checks stayed green throughout and never saw this; only the
render did. Follow-ups #129 (permanent guard) and #130 filed.
2026-07-15 16:56:39 +01:00
..

Docs map

Where human and agent documentation lives. Do not invent a third tree for the same facts.

Path Audience Role
../README.md Everyone What Nomarchy is, install, options tables
REQUIREMENTS.md Users + agents Minimum system requirements (GPU/OpenGL, RAM, disk, UEFI)
VISION.md Maintainers + agents Product north star toward v1.0 and beyond — themes, not a task queue
ROADMAP.md Maintainers + agents Design/decision records + shipped log (historical ✓)
HARDWARE.md Users + agents Firmware, profiles, drivers, unsupported machines
TESTING.md Maintainers + agents Verification ladder, honesty rule, ISO/VM recipes
RECOVERY.md Users Broken theme/desktop/boot → undo
OVERRIDES.md Users Downstream Nix overrides
MIGRATION.md Users Existing NixOS → Nomarchy without reinstall
OMARCHY.md Users Coming from Omarchy — bindings/theme/install/config map
Path Role
../AGENTS.md Agent entry point, any vendor/harness (CLAUDE.md symlinks to it)
../agent/README.md Agent instructions + executable loop state: BACKLOG, LOOP, VERIFICATION, …
../.claude/ Claude Code adapter only: permissions + subagent defs

How work flows

VISION  (what we want the product to feel like)
   │
   ▼  human triages slices into…
BACKLOG (what's next, ordered — agents execute only this)
   │
   ▼  lasting design notes after ship →
ROADMAP ✓ entries

Agents do not implement directly from VISION or ROADMAP. They take the top actionable item in agent/BACKLOG.md (see agent/LOOP.md). They may append PROPOSED pitches that reference VISION § … or ROADMAP § ….