All checks were successful
Check / eval (push) Successful in 4m7s
The guest's unfaithful rofi geometry was already documented in TESTING.md §5. What was not, and what this closes, is that the bullet's fallback advice — "measure text against the 40% window width instead" — is exactly how #131 stayed wrong for weeks, and my own #131 fix made it stale on top of that (the width is calc( 84ch min 65% ) now). Measuring needs a width and a font, and both are per-theme: text menus render through themes/<slug>/rofi.rasi, where boreal + neon-glass pinned a fixed 620px while the rest used 40%, in fonts from Inter 11 to JetBrainsMono 14. The item measured one combination no theme ships, concluded "only truncates below 1920", and the truncation was live on a 2560 panel. So §5 now says: judge by rendering — hardware, or `rofi -dmenu -theme <the built rasi>` + `hyprctl layers` for the real width — and notes checks.rofi-text-width guards the invariant that makes it fit, never how it looks. Declined the other half (fixing the guest's fontconfig/icon cache): the screenshots are useful as content checks, and a guest that lied convincingly about spacing would be worse than one that obviously cannot. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Docs map
Where human and agent documentation lives. Do not invent a third tree for the same facts.
| Path | Audience | Role |
|---|---|---|
| ../README.md | Everyone | What Nomarchy is, install, options tables |
| REQUIREMENTS.md | Users + agents | Minimum system requirements (GPU/OpenGL, RAM, disk, UEFI) |
| VISION.md | Maintainers + agents | Product north star toward v1.0 and beyond — themes, not a task queue |
| ROADMAP.md | Maintainers + agents | Design/decision records + shipped log (historical ✓) |
| HARDWARE.md | Users + agents | Firmware, profiles, drivers, unsupported machines |
| TESTING.md | Maintainers + agents | Verification ladder, honesty rule, ISO/VM recipes |
| RECOVERY.md | Users | Broken theme/desktop/boot → undo |
| OVERRIDES.md | Users | Downstream Nix overrides |
| MIGRATION.md | Users | Existing NixOS → Nomarchy without reinstall |
| OMARCHY.md | Users | Coming from Omarchy — bindings/theme/install/config map |
Related (not under docs/)
| Path | Role |
|---|---|
| ../AGENTS.md | Agent entry point, any vendor/harness (CLAUDE.md symlinks to it) |
| ../agent/README.md | Agent instructions + executable loop state: BACKLOG, LOOP, VERIFICATION, … |
| ../.claude/ | Claude Code adapter only: permissions + subagent defs |
How work flows
VISION (what we want the product to feel like)
│
▼ human triages slices into…
BACKLOG (what's next, ordered — agents execute only this)
│
▼ lasting design notes after ship →
ROADMAP ✓ entries
Agents do not implement directly from VISION or ROADMAP. They take
the top actionable item in agent/BACKLOG.md (see agent/LOOP.md).
They may append PROPOSED pitches that reference VISION § … or
ROADMAP § ….