Files
Nomarchy/docs
Bernardo Magri 4a0b76cc97
All checks were successful
Check / eval (push) Successful in 3m43s
feat(branding): drop the nixpkgs codename — "Nomarchy 26.05", not "(Yarara)"
Yarara is nixpkgs' release name. Carrying it in PRETTY_NAME told users
something true about our upstream and nothing about our product, in the one
string every fetch tool and greeter reads.

Upstream hardcodes the codename into VERSION, PRETTY_NAME and
VERSION_CODENAME (misc/version.nix) with no switch, and
`system.nixos.codeName = ""` is the wrong lever — it renders "26.05 ()".
So the assembled strings are overridden through the merge hooks upstream
does provide (extraOSReleaseArgs / extraLSBReleaseArgs), which is already
where our project URLs live. lsb-release gets the same treatment; it
carried the codename in three fields of its own.

Empty VERSION_CODENAME/DISTRIB_CODENAME is deliberate: `//` cannot remove a
key, os-release(5) makes every field optional, and the file already ships
ANSI_COLOR="" and IMAGE_ID="".

nixos-version still prints "(Yarara)" and is left alone on purpose: that
command reports which nixpkgs the system was built from — the one question
the codename actually answers. Reaching it would mean patching a nixpkgs
script for no gain.

Verified on the built system: PRETTY_NAME="Nomarchy 26.05", VERSION="26.05",
VERSION_ID="26.05"; lsb DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Nomarchy 26.05",
LSB_VERSION="26.05". fastfetch's os line reads PRETTY_NAME, so it follows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-16 14:09:00 +01:00
..

Docs map

Where human and agent documentation lives. Do not invent a third tree for the same facts.

Path Audience Role
../README.md Everyone What Nomarchy is, install, options tables
REQUIREMENTS.md Users + agents Minimum system requirements (GPU/OpenGL, RAM, disk, UEFI)
VISION.md Maintainers + agents Product north star toward v1.0 and beyond — themes, not a task queue
ROADMAP.md Maintainers + agents Design/decision records + shipped log (historical ✓)
HARDWARE.md Users + agents Firmware, profiles, drivers, unsupported machines
TESTING.md Maintainers + agents Verification ladder, honesty rule, ISO/VM recipes
RECOVERY.md Users Broken theme/desktop/boot → undo
OVERRIDES.md Users Downstream Nix overrides
MIGRATION.md Users Existing NixOS → Nomarchy without reinstall
OMARCHY.md Users Coming from Omarchy — bindings/theme/install/config map
Path Role
../AGENTS.md Agent entry point, any vendor/harness (CLAUDE.md symlinks to it)
../agent/README.md Agent instructions + executable loop state: BACKLOG, LOOP, VERIFICATION, …
../.claude/ Claude Code adapter only: permissions + subagent defs

How work flows

VISION  (what we want the product to feel like)
   │
   ▼  human triages slices into…
BACKLOG (what's next, ordered — agents execute only this)
   │
   ▼  lasting design notes after ship →
ROADMAP ✓ entries

Agents do not implement directly from VISION or ROADMAP. They take the top actionable item in agent/BACKLOG.md (see agent/LOOP.md). They may append PROPOSED pitches that reference VISION § … or ROADMAP § ….