feat(fingerprint): password OR fingerprint in parallel at one prompt
Some checks failed
Check / eval (push) Failing after 2m45s

Bernardo promoted the PROPOSED item live: with fingerprint PAM on,
sudo/login should accept whichever factor comes first instead of
pam_fprintd's wait-for-the-reader-then-password. Stock PAM cannot
express parallel factors (linux-pam#301), so this packages
pam-fprint-grosshack v0.3.0 (pkgs/, pinned from GitLab — the
field-standard fprintd fork), source-reviewed before packaging: every
failure path (no reader, no prints, fprintd absent/hung, timeout,
password typed) returns PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL and falls through; a
typed password is only ferried via PAM_AUTHTOK to the stock
`auth sufficient pam_unix.so … try_first_pass` rule — the module never
validates passwords itself, so it cannot lock out password login.

New option nomarchy.hardware.fingerprint.parallel, default TRUE (the
better UX is what opting into fingerprint PAM buys; false = stock
sequential). Wiring swaps the modulePath of stock fprintd's rule slot
(mkForce) so the sufficient-before-pam_unix ordering is inherited, not
recomputed. README + downstream template rows added.

Verified: V2 — checks.hardware-toggles extended to three nodes, green:
parallel node asserts the grosshack auth line precedes pam_unix in
/etc/pam.d/sudo and that with NO reader a correct password still
passes sudo while a wrong one fails (the lockout-safety invariant);
seqpam node gets stock pam_fprintd and no grosshack; nopam gets
neither. flake check + option-docs + template-sot green.
V3 pending (HARDWARE-QUEUE, AMD dev box): the real type-or-touch race,
fprintd-stopped fallback, hyprlock/greeter after a fingerprint win.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-12 19:03:56 +01:00
parent c840202018
commit 7aae204014
9 changed files with 175 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -134,18 +134,11 @@ high-ROI, etc.) live in the journal + ROADMAP — not here.*
fixture. Control-center / MOTD already mention these; the gap is the
silent first *graphical* session for people who never open those.
- **Fingerprint *or* password, in parallel** (2026-07-11, Bernardo) —
`fingerprint.pam` gives pam_fprintd's sequential UX: sudo waits on
the reader, password only after failure/timeout. Bernardo wants
either factor accepted at the same prompt (type the password *or*
touch the sensor, whichever comes first). Stock PAM can't express
this; needs a parallel-conversation module (e.g. `pam-any`, not in
nixpkgs — would be a new package + `fingerprint.pam = "any"` mode).
Cost: medium (package + PAM wiring + careful lockout testing on real
hardware). Security note: keep sudo fallback sane if fprintd hangs.
_(#80#83 + #85#88 shipped 2026-07-11. Theme A day-2 + neon-glass finish
shipped — VISION ✓. Dock/hibernate V3 → HARDWARE-QUEUE.)_
shipped — VISION ✓. Dock/hibernate V3 → HARDWARE-QUEUE. Parallel
fingerprint-or-password shipped 2026-07-12 (Bernardo promoted it live;
`fingerprint.parallel`, pam-fprint-grosshack) — reader V3 →
HARDWARE-QUEUE.)_
### v1.0 pointer

View File

@@ -59,6 +59,19 @@ the **T14s** (webcam case).
the re-lit panel. If that happens on hardware, the "Laptop screen
off" row needs a rework (mirror instead of disable, or drop until
a Hyprland bump) — file it as a NOW bug with the coredump.
- [ ] **Parallel fingerprint-or-password on the real reader** (AMD dev
box, 2026-07-12) — with a finger enrolled and
`fingerprint.pam = true` (parallel is the default): `sudo -k true`
must show ONE prompt ("Enter Password or Place finger…"); typing
the password immediately works, touching the sensor instead works,
wrong-finger ×3 falls back to password, and password keeps working
with fprintd stopped (`systemctl stop fprintd`). Also check
hyprlock and the greeter accept both factors and don't wedge on a
leftover prompt after a fingerprint win (known cosmetic quirk of
the hack — pthread_cancel'd prompt). `fingerprint.parallel = false`
must restore the old sequential behavior. VM already asserts the
PAM stack shape + password-only lockout safety with no reader
(checks.hardware-toggles).
- [ ] **#55 fingerprint enroll on real reader** — with
`nomarchy.hardware.fingerprint.enable` and a physical reader: System
Fingerprint Enroll a finger; List shows it; Verify succeeds; optional

View File

@@ -19,6 +19,29 @@ Template:
---
## 2026-07-12 — parallel fingerprint-or-password (interactive, promoted)
- **Task:** Bernardo promoted the PROPOSED "fingerprint or password in
parallel" item live; wants it default-on for fingerprint-PAM users.
- **Did:** Packaged pam-fprint-grosshack v0.3.0 (pkgs/, source-reviewed
first: all failure paths → PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL, typed password only
ferried via AUTHTOK to pam_unix try_first_pass — can't lock out
password login). New `nomarchy.hardware.fingerprint.parallel`
(default true; false = stock sequential). Wiring swaps stock fprintd's
rule modulePath (mkForce) so ordering is inherited. README/template
rows; BACKLOG PROPOSED entry closed into ROADMAP ✓.
- **Verified:** V2 — checks.hardware-toggles extended to three nodes and
green: parallel node asserts grosshack line before pam_unix in
/etc/pam.d/sudo AND `sudo -S` with the right password succeeds /
wrong password fails with NO reader present (the lockout invariant);
seqpam node = stock pam_fprintd, no grosshack; nopam = neither.
Package builds (meson needed libpam-wrapper + python3). flake check
green.
- **Pending:** V3 on the AMD dev box (HARDWARE-QUEUE): the actual
type-or-touch race, fprintd-stopped fallback, hyprlock/greeter
behavior after a fingerprint win (pthread_cancel'd prompt quirk).
- **Next suggestion:** dock + fingerprint V3 batch on hardware, then
#89 slice 3.
## 2026-07-12 — undock blackout rescue (interactive follow-up)
- **Task:** Bernardo: "if I turn the laptop screen off and undock, does
the panel come back?" Answer had to be tested, not recalled.